Can you believe the distressed look (Optional
link to informative and amusing article on shredded and/or faded) is back
in fashion for clothing? Some say
fashion is an art-form and like art, it can say something about the current environment. If that is so, are people making some sort of
commentary on the poor, starved, or homeless in our society by wearing shredded clothing?
Is
this a new look? NO! Faded jeans and/or ripped trends were in and
out between the 60’s and the 80’s. Back then it was supposed to be a non-verbal
holdover from anti-establishment
protests rather than the fashion statement it turned into later.
I can remember my younger brother
getting a new pair of jeans, washing them with bleach to make them look stonewashed, and
then cutting a slit in one of the knees to look hip. Our
mom nearly had
a cow when she saw what he had done to the jeans she just bought. My little brother was horrified when my mom
took his jeans, put an iron-on
patch over the cut knee, and made him wear the jeans to school that
way. When he complained about how she
ruined his jeans, mom informed us all that none of her children were to go
anywhere looking like a torn-up rag doll.
To which dad added if anyone was caught deliberately destroying good
clothes, they would forfeit their allowance until he was repaid for the clothing
item. (Not his exact words but definitely what he meant.) What other ways did
dad kill our desire for current and future fashions? Since a few of our clothes were hand-me-downs,
dad also made us wear belts to make sure any over-sized pants did not slip down,
fall off, or show our underwear - as is also fashionable now. Cruel
parents! Right!? (LOL- See a funny pants video here.) As you may have guessed from mom’s comment, “pre-owned” clothes with holes either got
patched before next wearer or were repurposed by being: cut-off/hemmed for summer
shorts for my brothers, torn apart for dad to use as shop rags, or given to my
grandmother to use as quilt pieces.
Frankly, I think some of the clothes
I see on the streets would be seen as embarrassing to a down
on luck person who would not choose to wear anything that accentuates their
situation. Even the most poverty-stricken would
prefer not to go around with such big raggedy holes
in their clothing because they would be more undressed than covered. People with limited incomes know clothes are
meant to protect you from sun or cold. After
all, how do holes help ward off nature’s harsh environment?
So why do the rich, and those trying to
imitate them or make an artsy statement, waste their money on these fashions? If they want to really make an important statement,
they should donate the money to a charity rather than pay a designer for torn
shreds. Instead of buying clothes that
should be in the trash bin: feed the hungry, house the poor, or work to save
the environment.
NOTE: Please excuse the excessive linking to dictionaries
for terms and phrases in this post. I thought
it might be necessary since some fashionable people may not be aware of the
definitions.
No comments:
Post a Comment